Section 2 (d) and 6 settled the case for a better management scope transaction, whether it was a "sale" or an exchange, the plaintiff alleged in the plaintiff that the disputed mutation was actually a "sell" mutation, but To separate the right, before the conversion of this agricultural property into better management, tion exchange / mutation appeared, agricultural real estate was eligible for exchange. With the condition that it should be exchanged for a better administration. The person claiming exemption would have to prove that he had acquired the property for better management when no exchange was for better management, he would be included in the definition of \ sale \ ter better management management. Was. Was disqualified in section 2 (d) of the North West Frontier Province Pre-Emission Act, 1987 and will be exempt from any transaction based on the intention of better management / better management of the parties' convenience, privacy and property space. Exchange. The matter was of exchange and matters were in good order. The plaintiff / earlier emperor failed to prove that the conversion of unknown conversion was of sale and in this case the vendee / defendants had proved that the property was exchanged. Was obtained by the two courts at the same time in the absence of any irregular / unlawful proceedings, as appropriate - for better management filed by the defendants. The jurisdictional error in the unanimous concurrent decisions of the courts below, in the revised cases, stated that the decisions were dismissed \ r \ n
Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2011
