Section 48, Part II [Section 36 to 74], OXX, R14 (1) and the OXXI Limitation Act (IX of 1908), Article 181 suits the trial under pre-arrest trial The Court of Appeal upheld the decision of the trial. The plaintiff challenged the appellate court's order in reviewing the plaintiff's decision to pay the sale price according to the market price, which was dismissed. The Supreme Court directed the plaintiff's request to the Additional District Judge to pay the property amount and payment. Define the time of , The Additional District Judge ordered the plaintiff to pay the purchase amount, Defendant dismissed the Additional District Judge's order explaining the purchase money to the High Court, which suspended the deferred order, however, after the plaintiff's request The Revenue Authority, while directing the effect on entertainment, was deemed fit for implementation of the decree. The appellant Court D dismissed the plaintiffs' appeals against the order of the execution court, stating that the execution court could not enjoy the application for execution while the sale price test case was still pending. Is pending before the High Court and the application for its execution was barred. In order to maintain the applicability of Section 48, CPC and Article 181 of the Limitation 1908, it was important to refer the person to a court under the provisions of Article 48, CPC and Article 181 of the Limitation Act 1908 Within three years of the implementation of the decree, when the right of the decree was exercised, any recent application for the implementation of that decree may be filed within 6 years.
Related judgments — Quetta High Court Balochistan, 2011
