MASHOOQ ALI versus SENIOR MEMBER, BOARD OF REVENUE BALOCHISTAN
Article 199 Constitutional Applicants Civil Service Applicants have challenged the appointments of assistants and stenographers by the Provincial Board of Revenue, which stated that the appointments were made in violation of the merit that the candidates failed the written test or that Also absent from these positions were appointments during the Departmental Selection Committee interview, giving the candidate certain numbers / signs, instead of making the merit list impossible for each candidate, as such list It cannot be produced until the number obtained in the interview The shorthand and typing skills were not assessed in the marks obtained in the Erik Examination, nor were members of the Department Selection Committee denied any wrongdoing. Submitted false affidavits but later apologized to the court. Senior Member of the State Board of Revenue acknowledged the violation of merit, in view of the statements of the chairman and members of the departmental selection committee, against the merit of the appointment. As a violation, appointments cannot be made. The appointment process related to material conflicts has been interrupted. Fairness and merit were backed up on the altar of sacrifice and corruption; these appointments were not made in reality or in the law, and their appointment was factual and a fraud which paid off at the expense of valuable resources. was done. The State High Court observed that the government was obliged to make the selection process transparent, as a culture of bad governance and corruption was promoted as a result of merit violations.
Related judgments — Quetta High Court Balochistan, 2011
