SUO MOTU CASE NO.24 OF 2010 AND HUMAN RIGHTS CASES NOS. 57701-P, 57719-G, 57754-P, 58152-P, 59036-S, versus
Section 14 Estacode, Volume I (2007 Eden) Instructions In the present case, employment after retirement record, has shown that the employment of retired civil servants / persons in the police department is subject to the provisions of law, section 14 of the Civil Servants Act, 1973. As well as the re-employment, the instructions contained in Estacode, Volume I, Eden, 2007 and the decisions of the High Courts on the matter were not considered binding, for the rule of law and the establishment of a constitutional system, Was necessary. That the letter and spirit of the relevant provisions be strictly adhered to, otherwise it would not be possible to provide an effective machinery to ensure law and order, especially in the Police Police Department, so that peace in the country at the same time. To avoid violating relevant provisions of the law that prevented the advancement of officers who also served in the military and were waiting for their promotion, they were already employed by retired officers. / Due to contract not getting opportunity = It was not only in the police department but also in order to achieve good governance. The same principle should be followed and strictly applied in other departments. The Supreme Court observed that the Attorney General will take the matter to the Government / Authorized Authority so that if any mistake is taken, necessary steps should be taken to rectify it, the Attorney General will state. Issue an order to the Secretary, the Establishment Division and the Chief Secretaries of the provinces to ensure that if any government employee or other person who has been employed has the right to do so in accordance with the terms of the clause.
Related judgments — Quetta High Court Balochistan, 2011
