CHAKAR ALI KHAN RIND versus GOVERNMENT OF BALOCHISTAN THROUGH SECRETARY
Arts 9, 24 and 199 Civil Procedure Code (v. 1908), OI, R 8 Constitution Petitioner asked the authorities to construct a protective wall so that residents of the area could be prevented from flooding. The ability to represent applicants in the applicant's entry was inherently natural. The applicant was representing the people of the area to resolve the grievances of the state; under Arts 9 and 24, there was a constitutional responsibility to protect the lives, liberty and property of the people. Under the constitution, the residents of the area were facing real danger to their lives and property due to the flood which forced the government to do construction work on the security wall, the articles were compensated by the state in the event of any loss, damage or loss. Were entitled to rehabilitation. However, the destruction caused by the floods etc. However, the loss which the applicant suffered has not been determined by the court. The prosecution's jurisdiction for the applicants to recover their complaint in the court of jurisdiction. Had the freedom to file.
Related judgments — Quetta High Court Balochistan, 2011
