Section 497 (2) of the Criminal Procedure (XLV of 1860), sections 376 and 354 of rape, intends to humiliate a woman and her criminal bail, a further investigation by a trial court grant, dealt with the matter mechanically. And issued an order without any advice. No reasonable explanation was offered by the record prosecution for 3 hours FIR could not be delayed in the discussion and consultation on the FIR, in the circumstances of the FIR forcibly committing adultery. The attempt was clearly charged, but the complainant / victim did not state that his clothes were stripped, stripped, torn, so without going into the contents of the FIR, Sections 37376 and 4 354, PPC components were missing, a prosecutor's witness in the case said he had entered the room. The prosecution's other witnesses and the complainant were shielded from the suspect's clutches, but the prosecution's other witnesses did not make a statement, so none of the witnesses stated that the complainant was Etienne and all of them complained to the prosecutor. Delivered from clutter, it seemed that the real status was hidden. And the situation may be different from what was said that the statements of the prosecution witnesses lack consistency. The accused was successful in presenting the bail case because the main provisions of Sections 6376 and 4 354 were missing from the PPC, further investigation. According to the principle, the accused was admitted in bail, under circumstances \ r \ n
Related judgments — Quetta High Court Balochistan, 2011
