Section 3 contempt petitioners alleged that the defendants violated the Supreme Court's order passed in the Civil Appeal Supreme Court, in the order that one observed that the notification under the rules 221 and 509 of the Pakistan Railway Not in conflict with. The Establishment Code, which states that the rules do not preclude applicants from receiving benefits, does not reflect a particular direction of the Supreme Court order, but it is only a matter of general nature if applicants are liable. The payment authorities stopped payment to the applicants after notification, he said that non-payment can be considered as denial of applicants' rights. But that did not mean that the authorities violated and disobeyed the Supreme Court order. Applicants have the right to refer to a court of competent law in the jurisdiction of the case in case of infringement of their rights and may refer to the Supreme Court order. The court is generally open to guide and assist the Supreme Court. And no specific direction was given; it was neither viable nor was the authorities' refusal to pay the applicants a violation of the order of the Supreme Court not to apply for contempt of court, it was rejected, Under the circumstances
Related judgments — Quetta High Court Balochistan, 2011
