Find a Lawyer

MALIK WAHEED ALIAS ABDUL HAMEED versus STATE

Clash with section 497 (2) of the Conduct Code (XLV of 1860), section 302/148/149 murder and deadly weapons, further investigation could not rule out the possibility of blood feuds and net width. He was not charged with involvement in the case, was declared innocent in the ongoing investigation and nothing was recovered from it and neither of the two were given any special injury. The participant had already been granted bail and had nothing on record to indicate that the complainant had filed an application for cancellation of the participant's bail, the effect of the applicant's bail. The question needed further investigation and on this score he dismissed the case. Allowed

Related judgments — Supreme Court, 2011

• MUKHTAR HUSSAIN v. SOHBAT ALI 2011 SCMR 1926
• AZMATULLAH v. State 2011 SCMR 1935
• Rana SHAHID AHMAD KHAN v. TANVEER AHMED 2011 SCMR 1937
• MUHAMMAD IQBAL v. State 2011 SCMR 1943
• Rao ZAHID TASAWAR v. SECRETARY M/O INTERIOR 2011 SCMR 1947
• ZAHOOR AHMED v. I.-G. OF POLICE, PUNJAB 2011 SCMR 1948
• PUNJAB SUGAR MILLS v. GOVERNMENT OF PUNJAB 2011 SCMR 1950
• DIRECTOR FBR, INTELLIGENCE AND INVESTIGATION DIRECTORATE, LAHORE v. AKHTAR ZAMAN KHAN 2011 SCMR 1951

All Supreme Court judgments of 2011 →

when you need a advocate from Hafizabad lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes