Section 13 and 35 of the Punjab Pre-Impedance Ordinance (XVIII of 1990), Section 13 and 36 of the Punjab Pre-Emission Act (I of 1913), Section 6 Pre-Impression Suite, 1975, filed by the plaintiff by petition under section 36 of Punjab Fresh judgment of the case under pre-emption ordinance, 1990, by the plaintiff not to prove the summons and dignity of the student while recording the latest evidence, the validity of the original plaintiff 8 1999 1999 before the first decree was passed. In 1993, the original plaintiff filed a lawsuit. At a time when the Punjab Pre-Emission Act, 1913 was in force, the order of such a case was not inappropriate because of his death because of his death the right of the original plaintiff after his death. His legal heritage was transferred, which made the provisions of section 16 of Punjab pre-emptive. The students were promulgated before their death under the Impression Act, 1991, there is no record to conclude and conclude that the original plaintiff had actually initiated such an inquiry. The plaintiff was several times demanded by the defendant to recognize his right to self-determination and to take possession of the suit land for payment of its original value, but he refused to do so. The plaintiff denied such request in a written statement. The plaintiff did not provide details of such claim in the plaintiff's or evidence, the defendant's oral statement of any witnesses making such ancillary by the original plaintiff. The source will not give priority to the denial, when there was no independent confirmation or confirmation of such claim on record. Sue in the name of such witness
