Find a Lawyer

PROVINCE OF PUNJAB THROUGH DISTRICT OFFICER (REVENUE), DISTRICT COLLECTOR, KASUR versus BORDER AREA COMMITTEE THROUGH CHAIRMAN

Article 185 Appeal was upheld in the Appeal / Supreme Court where the intra-court appeal was competent before the High Court, there could not have been any petition or appeal filed by a party to the benefit of which Could not have been produced in the Supreme Court without being obtained. In order to file such an intra-court appeal before the High Court, a window was left open for the Supreme Court to argue any appeal or the appeal was filed before the Supreme Court if in exceptional circumstances Appeal was not insisted on in the present case The affirmed case of this case was based on the principle of conducting the exercise of discretion, which did not abolish the constitutional jurisdiction of the Supreme Court.

Related judgments — Supreme Court, 2011

• SHAFQAT MEHMOOD v. State 2011 SCMR 537
• Hafiz Shaikh ANWAR-UL-HAQUE v. JEHAN KHAN 2011 PLD 540
• SANOBAR KHAN v. GOVERNMENT OF N.-W.F.P. through the Chief Secretary 2011 SCMR 546
• NASRULLAH v. State 2011 SCMR 549
• Malik SHAHID MEHMOOD v. Malik AFZAL MEHMOOD 2011 SCMR 551
• TARIQ ALI BAQAR v. NEW GOODWILL COMPUTERS 2011 SCMR 554
• State v. ABDUL KHALIQ 2011 PLD 554
• HUMAN RIGHTS CASE --- Application by Qazi Muhammad Anwar, President Supreme Court Bar Association, I 2011 SCMR 558

All Supreme Court judgments of 2011 →

law firms from Qazi Ahmed lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes