Section 8 fair rent, settlement agreement between the parties was granted to the tenant in 1991, and the landlord requested fair rent determination in the year 2003. To determine, upon request filed by the landlord or the tenant, the rental controller had exclusive jurisdiction and no contract could be restricted to the rent controller's jurisdiction to obtain a reasonable rental determination between the parties, If this had not been done before, the court would have asked any of the parties to the contract Comfortable does not permit the taking. Considering the unusual or to some extent the terms, because it will deprive the other party of the rent controller and other legal discrimination used by the lower appellate court while raising the rent by 10% after about 12 12 years. It was not unfair to demand interference with the exercise of the constitutional jurisdiction of. Using the jurisdiction of the Constitution, the High Court reversed the orders passed by the lower appellate court, without giving strict reasons, in the control of the lower appellate court and affirmed, in the possession of the landlord, that the landlord determined fair rent. Has surrendered its right to the Supreme Court, set aside the High Court decision and affirmed the orders passed by the Controller of Rent and confirmed it through the Lower Appeal Court of Appeal. Was granted \ r \ n
