Identification of the accused was not abandoned in accordance with rules 396 and 394 of the Anti-Terrorism Act (XXVII of 1997), Section 7 (h) and 21L Duty murder, with the prosecution witnesses having already seen the identity of the accused The parade was not isolated. Respect for each accused, but held jointly, witnesses did not describe the role of each of the accused in the incident, while identifying it, which was a hereditary defect. There were seven days of incredible delays and identity parades. After the arrest of the accused by the witnesses, the identity parade made the same dilemma; the witnesses' identification of the accused in the court was pointless; Medical evidence was reliable did not support the contents. The FLR courts below had to find the crime against the accused in an arbitrary manner with no application in mind.
