The trial court convicted the accused of illegal appeal under Article (1) of Pakistan, Article 4 (; (disp)) and sentenced them under section (1) of the Unlawful Disposal Act, 2, whether illegal. In the absence of any provision for appeal or revision request in the Disposal Act, 2005, the accused's appeal and the complainant's review were authorized before the High Court; whether the complainant's complaint under the Unlawful Settlement Act, 2005 There was a time when the matter relating to the ownership of the land and the property related to it was already a decision before the Civil Court as well as before the Evoki Trust Property Board. In the absence of any tangible evidence in this regard, the accused can be treated as land grabbers / land mafia / occupation groups for the purpose of the Unlawful Settlement Act, 2005. The courts below have filed a full bench of the Lahore High Court. The law declared by the United States was rightly adhered to and followed by the Supreme Court, even in the absence of continued physical possession of a piece of land for the purposes of the Disposal Act, 2005. ? Whether the complainant failed to present two witnesses before the trial, because according to the complainant himself, it was one of the two witnesses of the prosecution who had complained to the complainant about the incident. Aware of And whether the complainant has been able to prove his case against the accused beyond reasonable doubt \ r \ n
