Section 16 (1) (2) of the Constitution of Pakistan, Arts 185 (3) and 199 rent orders of tenants, prohibiting the defense of the tenant who controls the rent, instructs them to vacate the premises within 30 days. ? Appeal by the High Court if the tenant's constitutional application is dismissed and give him an opportunity to vacate the premises without notice and to hear the landlord and to continue paying the monthly rent without the need of the tenant. (1) Give the time of year. Emptying the cover within 30 days The legitimate tenant had a clear violation of the rental order and did not pay the landlord rent even in the appeal phase Appellate Court granted the tenant's request for a one year time grant on this date. Entertainment was provided when the case was decided to announce the matter. The decision, which was moved at a later date and then the appeal was dismissed while the tenant was given without notice and while giving the landlord a hearing, Lindlady later sued the appellate court judge. A complaint was sent to the Chief Justice of Pakistan and the Chief Justice of the High Court to the District and Sessions Judge, who, after an inquiry, said that the appellate court judges had failed to resolve the matter with the judicial mind. And that their integrity in these situations is questionable. Such clear remarks against an appellate court judge will require appropriate action against them. The Supreme Court dismissed the tenant's request and directed the office to send a copy of its decision to the Chief Justice's High Court so that it could begin its execution. App r \ nA appropriate suit against an appellate court judge