Article 185 (3) The petition for leave to appeal for the petitioners referred to the order under which the Division Bench of the Constitutional Appeal was dismissed, when the counsel for the applicant made a brief statement on the matter. After saying that they would not like. The petitioner and the statement were dismissed when the aforesaid petition came up for hearing before another bench of the High Court, the counsel for the applicant confirmed that he had informed the applicant that the applicant was under pressure. The request has been rejected for non-availability. It was claimed that the end of natural justice demanded that the error be corrected and that the parties could not suffer as a result of the error, in the form of presenting a law demanding the intervention of a lawyer. Was not where the lawyer did not pressurize during the argument. In any case or case, which was usual when no matter was presented on any merit, the Council was also unable to identify any error in the proceedings which the High Court Petition for leave of appeal. Is not equivalent to a deliberate and deliberate statement made by a lawyer before the bench.
