Section 12 law in evidence (10 of 1984), Article 72 Civil Procedure Code (v. 1908), section 115 agreement to sell the High Court's proof-amended jurisdiction, print suit filed by the defendants and the simultaneous appeal to the trial court And the lower appellate court rejected. But the High Court dismissed the case in favor of the plaintiffs in the jurisdiction of the review, which was not proved by the defendants in the execution of the valid sale agreement, and their evidence in connection with the payment of the outstanding balance was contradictory and the defendants occupied the tenants. And was not under contract. Because the sale and trial for the eviction and production against the plaintiffs were in favor of the plaintiff, it was decided to negate the plaintiff's position. Along with the trial of the documents contained under the agreement, the lower appellate court High Court also examined the review process. i, the jurisdiction was not asked to evaluate and re-evaluate the properties of the parties' evidence. In the absence of any illegal interference or non-reading / misinformation, the High Court examined the entire evidence, and any other possible consequences. Traveled beyond its jurisdiction in search of support, and such a course was not approved by the Supreme Court and guaranteed intervention. And the review jurisdiction filed by the Plaintiffs and the High Court-approved injunction in the case were rejected App r \ n \ r \ n Abdul Hakim v Habibullah and 11 others 1997 SCMR 1139 and Allah Dino V Mohammad Omar and 2 others 1974 SCMR 411 rel \ r \ n
