Find a Lawyer

AKHTAR ALI versus STATE

Section 2 302 (b) Qatil Ahmed detained the accused shortly after the presence of the prosecution witnesses, which was not a base decision for any purpose other than the defendant's request to defend him. The trial court and the appellate court were not open to any exception that led to the dismissal of the Supreme Court appeal.

Related judgments — Supreme Court, 2011

• IMRAN alias MANU v. State 2011 SCMR 932
• MUHAMMAD ILYAS KHAN v. SENIOR MEMBER, BOARD OF REVENUE, N.-W.F.P., PESHAWAR 2011 PLC(CS) 935
• MUHAMMAD ILYAS KHAN v. SENIOR MEMBER, BOARD OF REVENUE, N.-W.F.P., PESHAWAR 2011 PLC(CS) 935
• Ch. MUHAMMAD ASGHAR v. ELECTION TRIBUNAL OF UC-45, ARIFWALA 2011 SCMR 935
• ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF PAKISTAN v. AKHTAR ALI KHAN 2011 SCMR 939
• ABDUL MAJEED v. State 2011 SCMR 941
• DISTRICT COORDINATION OFFICER, DISTRICT DIR LOWER v. ROZI KHAN 2011 PLC(CS) 942
• ABDUL RASHID KHAN v. REGISTRAR, BAHAUDDIN ZAKARIA UNIVERSITY, MULTAN 2011 SCMR 944

All Supreme Court judgments of 2011 →

famous high court advocate from Moro lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes