Find a Lawyer

ABDUL MAJEED versus STATE

Section 2 30b (b) Qutel Amed could not establish his presence on the occasion of review of the evidence and the crime was not yet seen, the prosecution was imposing a ban and his case against the accused was reasonable. Doubt has to be proved beyond any doubt. The case of strangulation on the death of the accused's spouse in his house can never be moved, but the prosecution's case will be handled along with other evidence, but it will prove to be a crime on its own. It was not enough for him to prove his guilt. At the time of his wife's murder, the accused in the house was not established by prosecution. There is no positive evidence available against the accused, so he cannot be punished for the idea that his wife was murdered in his house. It was only him and no one else who killed the victim, he was acquitted.

Related judgments — Supreme Court, 2011

• MUHAMMAD ILYAS KHAN v. SENIOR MEMBER, BOARD OF REVENUE, N.-W.F.P., PESHAWAR 2011 PLC(CS) 935
• Ch. MUHAMMAD ASGHAR v. ELECTION TRIBUNAL OF UC-45, ARIFWALA 2011 SCMR 935
• AKHTAR ALI v. State 2011 SCMR 937
• ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF PAKISTAN v. AKHTAR ALI KHAN 2011 SCMR 939
• DISTRICT COORDINATION OFFICER, DISTRICT DIR LOWER v. ROZI KHAN 2011 PLC(CS) 942
• ABDUL RASHID KHAN v. REGISTRAR, BAHAUDDIN ZAKARIA UNIVERSITY, MULTAN 2011 SCMR 944
• ASHIQ HUSSAIN v. State 2011 SCMR 947
• RIAZ HANIF RAHI v. SAEED-UZ-ZAMAN SIDDIQUI 2011 SCMR 948

All Supreme Court judgments of 2011 →

top advocates from Sehwan lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes