Section 3/5 Constitution of Pakistan, Article 204 contempt of court. 161 Based on a news item published in a newspaper in the 2010 Daily, the petitioner demanded the commencement of contempt of court proceedings against the respondents, as stated by the respondent Ali, former Chief Justice of Pakistan, And as the newspaper reveals, it was Judiciary who took oath under General Pervez Musharraf's PCO in 2000 and Judiciary took oath under the second PCO of 2007. Ethically similar, as there was no difference between the two sets of judiciary, the petitioner argued that such statement was derogatory and defamed the judiciary and further alleges that They have doubted the legality of the seven-member bench order which is dated 11 11 2007. The Chief Justice, who appeared before the court in the press clipping of the Supreme Court, was in a position to be sub judice of the case. ort, which was in fact some excerpt of the interview, which did not reveal either the question or the whole answer; therefore, no opinion could be formed, so there was a direct competition in which the defendants gave the answers so as to make it fair. Therefore, commenting on a fair judge or decision is the right of every citizen as long as the purpose of the comment is in good faith. Fair comments from an individual are based on his or her point of view, under any law. Identifiable where opinion is, does not offend the judiciary and the view does not offend the judiciary, all general comments collect public confidence and the court By the system owner and the defendant's atomic symbols are Healthy
