WORLDCALL TELECOM LIMITED versus PAKISTAN TELECOMMUNICATION AUTHORITY THROUGH CHAIRMAN, ISLAMABAD
O XLI, R 19 Constitution of Pakistan, Article 185 (3) dismissed for dismissal of appeal for re-entry. The names of the two advisers were officially printed in the list, but no one appeared in court until after the appeal was dismissed in default and the certified copy of the HC order was obtained. After doing so, they kept quiet for another 20 days, without offering to delay each day. The court, determined under the Limitation Act, 1908, within a period of thirty days, disclosed the facts that the applicant was not diligently pursuing the remedy because after obtaining a certified copy of the order, to re-enter the appeal. Immediate steps were not taken which would create the right of limitation. On the other hand and in favor of the law will always be in favor of those who were careful, not those who were negligent in pursuing their procurement. There is no exception to the situation in order to appeal the High Court for leave to appeal. Action can be taken against
