Find a Lawyer

BLACK GOLD IND. versus FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN

Article 185 (3) The petitioner's counsel for the release of the pay order stated that the matter had already been decided in the matter and there was no pending case against the applicant on the matter which was before the High Court. Had appeared and despite the applicant's final decision on the matter, the pay order remained in the defendant's custody for the reason that he had not submitted a bank guarantee for the release of the pay order, in the absence of this case. Respondents will issue a pay order submitted by the applicant. Obtaining a relevant bank guarantee If the matter is still pending, the applicant will be bound by the terms of the High Court's unwanted decision \ r \ n

Related judgments — Supreme Court, 2011

• WAPDA v. Qari MUHAMMAD FEROZE 2011 PLC(CS) 950
• Mst. SULTANA BIBI alias RUBI v. State 2011 SCMR 951
• FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN through Secretary Finance Government of Pakistan v. KHALID JAVED 2011 PLC(CS) 954
• QEEMAT GUL v. State 2011 SCMR 954
• ANWAR SAJID v. ABDUL RASHID KHAN 2011 SCMR 958
• WORLDCALL TELECOM LIMITED v. PAKISTAN TELECOMMUNICATION AUTHORITY through Chairman, Islamabad 2011 SCMR 959
• Ch. MUHAMMAD ILYAS GUJJAR v. CHIEF ELECTION COMMISSIONER OF PAKISTAN 2011 PLD 961
• REFERENCE NO. 1 OF 2011 2011 SCMR 962

All Supreme Court judgments of 2011 →

advocate from Allahabad lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes