Section 12 Constitution of Pakistan, Article 185 (3) demanding the dismissal of the suit application for the specific performance of the sale contract was contrary to the judgment passed by the High Court, under which the applicant's specific performance Your filing was supported on exclusion. The property, dismissed, was to be paid by the applicant with the remaining amount, but he failed to make payment even after the date and time of the extension, the petitioner's lawyer requested that the defendant be bound to appear. Earlier, the relevant officer, the documents prepared at the cut-off date, but failed to do so, could not be held liable for the applicant that he did not pay part of his contract, choosing the lawyer for the applicant. The process could not be accepted, as the applicant, first of all, had to stand on his feet and Manifesto had to show that he himself was present on the due date when he prepared the money and appeared before the concerned officer, adhering to the terms and conditions of the contract between the parties, on the other hand, but he could not do so. I failed
