MRS. ZAIB-UN-NISA versus SECRETARY HEALTH, GOVERNMENT OF PUNJAB, LAHORE
Section 2 (f) and 2 (h) Constitution of Pakistan, Article 199 Termination of Constitutional Request Service The applicant's position in determining alternative treatment of competent authority appeals in the case of a joint inquiry proceeding. For the applicant, the provisions of the Punjab Employees' Talent, Discipline and Accountability Act 2006 were not applicable, he was a contract employee, and the defendant did not have the authority to pass a termination order separating the applicant. The method was cure. Appeals and constitutional petitions were not employed with moderate wording and the corporation's employment included all employees, whether contractual or otherwise and could be prosecuted by a corporation, corporate body, authority, law firm or any contractor employee of another organization. Is. When an action is taken against more than one employee under the Punjab Employees' Talent, Discipline and Accountability Act, 2006, the senior most employee will become the authorized authority of the HC for all the employees while the constitution. In the case of jurisdiction provided under Article 199 of the K, investigations cannot be interfered with. The constitutional application for the facts filed by the authorized forum was rejected on the ground that the order was not approved by the authorized authority and the applicant has an alternative method of appeal against the said order.
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2015
