The creation of entries in Section 45 Special Relief Act (I of 1877), Section 42 Suite of Declaration for New Rights, Revenue Record, shows that the suit is in the name of the department canal and that the plaintiffs have the same trial court and lower allotment. What is the claim The appellate court justified the case in favor of the plaintiffs when allotment and occupation entries were available in favor of the canal department since 1922 and such entry was not substituted or proved by the plaintiffs. They were against the record by the tax authorities in favor of taxation and they were defrauding in the eyes of the law The Board of Revenue had rightly excluded entries in favor of the plaintiffs, and the trial court passed the findings of the Board of Revenue. There was no evidence to set the order entered by both. The courts below were defamatory of this record because it set aside the order passed by the Board of Revenue, which was based on evidence and record, using the jurisdiction of the High Court review, by the two courts below. Approved decisions and orders set aside and litigation filed by the plaintiffs, review of the circumstances allowed
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2015
