MST. RIFFAT SIDDIQUE versus DISTRICT CO-ORDINATION OFFICER
Arts 199 Constitutional Jurisdiction High Court Scope The policy of appointing an elementary school educator for the recruitment of teachers in civil service government schools was stated under which 05 marks for the MA (Education) degree were specified. The applicant, after joining the recruitment process, was terminated due to his conduct and an unorganized / legitimate policy which challenged the merit list. The validity of the 05 numbers for the MA (Education) degree was a policy decision that could not be questioned and was replaced with a number of 10. In the constitutional jurisdiction policy, the High Court may be declared unlawful if it is not approved by the Authority under any law or under the unlawful policy the applicants are to be part of the appointment process under an unorganized policy. Due to lack of legal sanction due to failure, it faced the same challenge after failing law. In the present case, there were no violations of C, Rule, Policy or Terms of Appointment.
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2015
