MUHAMMAD IMRAN YOUNAS versus DISTRICT COLLECTOR (RING ROAD), LAHORE
Sections 4, 5A, 17 (4) and 17 (6) of the Constitution of Pakistan, Arts 199, 23 and 24 The notification regarding acquisition of constitutional land was obtained for the construction of the land of the applicants and other persons and the land. The notification was obtained under Section 4 of the acquisition. The Act, 1894 was issued and the award was given and all persons whose land was acquired for the construction of an interchange emergency and its notification issued under section 17 (4) of the Land Acquisition Act 1894. And was issued under s 17 (6) but none of the land applicants were included in the aforesaid notification. A fresh notification was issued under section 4 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, for the acquisition of applicants' land. The applicants believed that the exchange was completed and their land was being acquired for gardening purposes only. Nor was the Comp Competent Authority able to obtain this land in the public interest for the purpose of building interchange weldability, and when required, the authorities did not do their best, their action was justified by law and accuracy, even as long as There was nothing malicious on their part that could not be established by the applicants, even there was nothing to accuse him of maliciousness or malaria unless this was proved by the evidence. Under section 5A of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, in the form of raising objections, the collector had the remedy under which the property of the applicants was acquired in accordance with the law and he was recovering the compensation under the award. Was denied and applied for a raise. The life of the administration
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2015
