MST. AMEERAN MAI versus I.-G. PUNJAB POLICE, LAHORE
Standing Order No. 1 of Arts 199 and 25, issued by Inspector General of Police Punjab of 2008 [as amended in June 2011], based on family claims, discrimination of educational standards on the service of change husband Expired and he claimed that his son was entitled to an appointment against the post of Constable Authorities but he refused the appointment of the applicant's son on the basis of his qualification as a medal instead of a matriculation. The power of the notification issued in 2014 was changed to mean that her husband expired on 11, 2011, while, In the notification issued in 2014, which was converted to metric standards of middle education, could not be applied with frustration over the applicant. That two other people were also given space by the authorities, but the applicant's son was treated unfairly. Once a right has been accumulated on a person, then it cannot be redeemed after issuing another notification. Existing rights or benefits may be harmed that the minimum policy standard for admission to a driver constable under the changed policy will be metric, even for the children of heed witnesses or persons applying for family claims. Also, but the next amended number 2008 2008 2008 the next number effect should be approved in the future constitutional application. circumstances r \ n \ r \ n
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2015
