In section 2?2 (b) and Q 34 of the trial, the joint purpose of filing the testimonial testimony was filed after a three-month delay, with the testimony of both the ocular account unfaithful to strengthen the prosecution's case. Improvements, as alleged in the FIR, proved that the complainant had changed his motive and reported a different story of the Franzic Science Laboratory with regard to Kalashnikov, allegedly recovered from the suspect. Was stopped by the prosecution, and the negative report of the forensic science laboratory stated that Kalashnikov had a record I was brought up. During the defense investigation, the recovery of the accomplices was not affected, the evidence of the co-prosecutor, which was denied to the extent of the co-accused, cannot be ascertained against the accused without any independent and strong seriousness, in which case I am very lacking. Prosecution failed to link the accused beyond any shadow to the commission of the crime, the trial court adjourned the matter to convict the accused
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2015
