JEHANGIR MEHMOOD CHEEMA versus GOVERNMEMT OF PAKISTAN, MINISTRY OF INTERIOR
Section 2 Financial Institutions (Recovery of Finance) Ordinance (XLVI of 2001), Section 9 Exit (Control) of Pakistan Rules 2010, R2 (1) (d) Constitution of Pakistan, Article 199 Constitution of a Company Chairman and Director ( The applicant)) The fact that the legality of the alleged defaulter on the Exit Control List (ECL) during the approval of the alleged default pending recovery suit recovery suit in the repayment area is a fact of fact. A person was sued by a commercial bank. It cannot be decided yet that there was no room for such persons to be named on the Exit Control List or to deprive them of their basic right to travel abroad or to restrict their right to free movement. Unless it is announced by someone. In the courts of competent jurisdiction established under the banking laws, the only decision in the matters relating to commercial loans was the sole authority of the judgment which was filed by the bank. No decision was made by the banking court on the status of the applicants as applicants; the commercial bank, the State Bank of Pakistan have no jurisdiction or the federal government does not have the authority to make any person the default for this matter. Holds the courts of competent jurisdiction over any action by the commercial bank or the State Bank of Pakistan, to determine whether the money is determined by a customer on the bank account and then his name It was recommended to be on the control list. Violating only the law-abiding principles, but the founding system of banking law and banking courts fails.
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2015
