MRS. WAJIHA MOHSIN SHAHZAD versus NATIONAL HIGHWAY AUTHORITY
The R4 Service Tribunals Act (LXX of 1973), dismissing Section 4 from the appellant serving as an assistant director, submitted a request for a two-year leave grant. This request was recommended by the Director (Personnel), however, the Applicant did not have the National Highway Authority (without knowing the outcome of his request for leave and waiting for clearance to be sent to a foreign country). Talent and Discipline) Action was taken against the appellant under the rules. , 1995 and was also awarded a employment dismissal penalty. As a public servant, the appellant was required to wait for leave to approve, but she went abroad without the leave's approval. The Director (Personnel) was just a proposal and not an approval order. The Appellant could not leave the country or his duty could not be vacated without the approval of the leave; the submission of leave application by the employees in his department, does not mean that the leave would have been done. In his favor, the appellant was obliged to inquire from the department about the fate of the petition for leave to appeal. It had committed serious corruption for which it deserved a great punishment because the country needed the services of qualified and talented persons, if the employment of the appellant was dismissed, the appellant was retained. If qualified, they will not be in this position. Finding service in any government department will, under the circumstances, deprive him of his services;
Related judgments — Federal Service Tribunal, 2012
