Find a Lawyer

SYED HAYAT SHAH versus SECRETARY, MINISTRY OF NARCOTICS CONTROL, GOVERNMENT OF PAKISTAN, ISLAMABAD

Sections 3, 5 and 10 of the Service Tribunals Act (LXX of 1973), after appellant was dismissed from section 4, he was dismissed from the job after making a charge sheet and inquiring against him that he had filed a non- Legally accepted the consolation. An inquiry was made in which he was given every opportunity to examine the witnesses. Authorities thoroughly observed the legal and physical rituals in this case. And also because the appellant was absconding with justice, the appellant was in no way entitled to relief because he himself was fleeing from justice.

Related judgments — Federal Service Tribunal, 2012

• MUHAMMAD NASEEM KHAN v. ACCOUNTANT-GENERAL PAKISTAN (REVENUE), ISLAMABAD 2012 PLC(CS) 613
• Mrs. WAJIHA MOHSIN SHAHZAD v. NATIONAL HIGHWAY AUTHORITY 2012 PLC(CS) 1323
• MIAN MUHAMMAD v. FEDERAL PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION through Secretary 2012 PLC(CS) 1330
• KHALID LATIF BUTT v. FEDERAL BOARD OF REVENUE through Chairman, Ministry of Finance, Islamabad 2012 PLC(CS) 1339
• Syed ZAHIR SHAH v. DIVISIONAL SUPERINTENDENT, PAKISTAN RAILWAYS, KARACHI 2012 PLC(CS) 166
• MUHAMMAD AKRAM JAVED v. SECRETARY/CHAIRMAN, M/O RAILWAYS, ISLAMABAD 2012 PLC(CS) 169
• MEHMOOD KHAN v. FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN through Chairman, Pakistan Railway Board Ministry 2012 PLC(CS) 175
• NAEEM IQBAL v. FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN through Secretary, Ministry of Defence, Government of Pakistan 2012 PLC(CS) 184

All Federal Service Tribunal judgments of 2012 →

solicitors from Kashmore lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes