MUHAMMAD NASEEM KHAN versus ACCOUNTANT-GENERAL PAKISTAN (REVENUE), ISLAMABAD
Section 19 of the Service Tribunals Act (LXX of 1973), Article 4 of the Constitution of Pakistan, claimed that the appellant / pensioners' pension was increased on retirement, but 50% of the pensioners were deducted in a month. The year's pension was paid and the remaining 8% pension was paid each month to the appellant from time to time, which was received by the appellant every month when the pension period expired. If so, the authorities do not pay them the expected pension from time to time to increase their pension and pay for arrears with the increase. I request had been rejected, the increase in the transferee pension to pensioners and the period of pension in the case confirmed. The Supreme Court, the High Court and the service tribunals should be extended, even until the trial of the appellants, in the circumstances, justified in praying for the same relief, which was stated if other appellants too If the same relief was not given, then it would be discriminatory when some officers were getting the benefit of increase in pension while others would not get such relief, it would create an unusual situation attracting the established law. In which there can be no discrimination, and all persons are entitled to equal protection of the law, as Article 25 Or guarantee. Constitution officials were instructed to determine the rate at which the appellant's pension was restored from the date that he was receiving fifty percent of the remaining pension. They will also be given arrears, however, before their replacement pension is restored.
Related judgments — Federal Service Tribunal, 2012
