ABDUL RAFEEQ MUGHAL versus GENERAL MANAGER (OPERATIONS), PAKISTAN RAILWAYS
Section 12 Service Tribunals Act (LXX of 1973), Removal of Section 4 (Special Powers) Ordinance (XVII of 2000), Sections 3, 5, 6 and 10, serving as Assistant Foreman Transfer services were conducted with regular inquiry appellant during. Due to allegations with the showcase notice that he alleges that he had misappropriated the contents of the railway for Rs 18,000, an inquiry has been issued regularly, without any reason for the reason. Without giving a reason, without it, the accused can not be punished with great impunity. Regular court inquiries, when the allegations were denied by them, the preliminary inquiry report could not be a regular inquiry, the subsequent order was set with the instruction that the appellant be restored to his original position and D. The department was remanded by Novo to take disciplinary action. After the adoption of the procedure prescribed under the law, the disciplinary proceedings will be initiated and completed, preferably within 120 days. Questions regarding benefits will depend on the outcome of the fresh action.
Related judgments — Federal Service Tribunal, 2012
