MUHAMMAD HASSAN versus PROVINCIAL GOVERNMENT THROUGH CHIEF SECRETARY G.B. GILGIT
Article Civil Jurisdiction of Civil Service Appointment and Development The Applicants of the High Court were appointed as Sub Engineers in the year Sub 1984 iners and since their appointment they have been working in the same position on which no respondent. Was appointed as Assistant Engineer in 2005. Permanent designation of the work charge was implemented in 2009 in the form of Assistant Engineer BPS-9, which was to be filled up by the department in accordance with the rules, officials said. Violated the defendant, was the simple advertisement of one of the sub-engineers. Embracing the responsibilities of seniority list and fitness record, looking forward to developing the position of Assistant Engineer for years, most senior sub engineers instead of taking care of developing their fitness, change the \ omen name as And use the terms. In order to honor the respondent at the cost of the re-designation, in full violation of the relevant rules, the E and Law appointment orders were revoked and vacated without any legal authority and post. Was given and the authorities were instructed to fill it up by promoting the relevant rules, keeping in mind the seniority and fitness of the engineers waiting for the sub-engineers. Department \ r \ n \ r \ n
