Article 75 Contempt of Court contempt of court Act (LXIV of 1976), sections 3, 4 and 5 contempt of court were issued notices to all concerned for publishing a ridiculous news in the newspaper against the high court of Gilgit-Baltistan. Satisfactory Response to the publication of the news All the respondents had committed contempt of court under Sections 3 and 4 of the contempt of court Act 1976, read along with Article 75 of the Gilgit-Baltistan (Empowerment and Self-Governance) Order, 2009 , And could be punished under Section 5 of the Contempt of Contempt Court Act, 1976, the respondent, who was the chief editor of the relevant newspaper, apologized in writing and put himself at the mercy of the court, therefore, the Chief The court considered the amnesty sincere and thus no sentence was imposed and the amnesty was extended to it as well. An apology was also given to another respondent, who was practicing a lawyer, who valued this value and submitted this request, with the Bar and Young Lords Forum member making his unconditional apology in open court. The Chief Court, however, urged the defendant / lawyer to understand the dignity of the courts and the bar, and to pursue future professional ethics as part of legal reinforcement. The remaining respondents were convicted and sentenced to six months simple imprisonment for a fine of Rs 5,000 each.
