MST. KHUSHAB JUMA versus GOVERNMENT OF PAKISTAN THROUGH DEFENCE SECRETARY, RAWALPINDI
The allotment of land to the deceased son of the plaintiff (appellant), the defendant (defendant) in charge of the Armed Forces in question who allegedly received the collateral of the revenue staff. Was successful in preparing fake and fraudulent documents in his favor, after officials confirmed the disposition of the disputed land in his favor, the plaintiff filed a lawsuit against the defendant to declare relief with relief. What. In order to obtain compensation from the plaintiff and to confirm the disposition of the disputed land in favor of the plaintiff, the civil court dismissed it as ambiguous and did not prove that the late land was allotted. The plaintiff's original allotment order was available on record and the defendant's ability to approve the allotment depended on the defendant's documentation to make sure that the allotted land was later allotted to her. had gone. But no special order has been exhibited that was approved by a competent authority who canceled the allotment made in favor of the plaintiff's deceased son or who may have allotted the land in favor of the defendant. The land in question was transferred to the defendant. The unchangeable variable, in which the land was shown as `net governmental ', showed irreversible mutation that the reason for its confirmation was based on admission to` measles gadvari', which resulted in the deputy teaching assistant. Respondent's written statement in response to defendant mut change was rejected by the land allocation story. the Mo is currently authorized by a competent authority
