SAFDAR ENTERPRISES PVT. LIMITED THROUGH JAVED HUSSAIN versus NATIONAL BANK OF PAKISTAN THROUGH PRESIDENT HEAD OFFICE
Sections 2 (b) (ii) and 22 Gilgit-Baltistan (Empowerment and Self-Governance) Order, 2009, Arts 69, 71 (2) Writ Petition Suit for Recovery of Loans Jurisdiction (Recovery) Finance Ordinance, 2001 In the Scope Intra Court of Appeals, the Chief Court of SCOP Bank (Defendant) filed a recovery case against the applicants (applicants), and since the claim has exceeded fifty million, That has been speculated under Section 2 (b) (II) of the Financial Institutions (Recovery of Finance) Ordinance, 2001, the Chief Justice of the Chief Justice has submitted the case to a Chief Justice Judge, The Hindus have filed a writ petition against the order of the Chief Justice stating that the nomination and submission of any person to the Judge of the Chief Justice, Section 2 (B) of the Financial Institutions (Recovery of Finance) Ordinance, 2001 ) (II), which the Department considered only the High Court, not the Chief Court, and that the Chief Justice had no connection. The intra-court appeal was upheld and if the nominee judge approved a verdict against the defaulters, they would lose the right to appeal the intra-court appeal. The validity court extended the Gilgit-Baltistan chief court using all the powers of the High Court under the general rules. Financial Institutions (Recovery of Finance) was granted the authority to entertain a case under the Ordinance 2001, as the Chief Judge of the High Court exercised jurisdiction of the Banking Court under the Ordinance and as a High Court Judge in its ordinary jurisdiction. Didn't work. Therefore, against any order / decision / decree passed by them, the financial institutions (recovery of taxes) should come.
