SOHAIL BOSTAN CHAUDHARY versus MDA THROUGH CHAIRMAN MDA MIRPUR AK
Article 44 Written Request Abroad Plot Allotment by Quota Applicant Who Describes Being a First Class State Subject. Permanent resident of Mirpur village and resident in UK claimed to be eligible for allotment from quota abroad but it was allotted plot from General quota as there was no such plot available at that time respondent who was also resident in UK, Moved the request for allotment from the overseas quota to the respondent plot and option plot canceled the allotment because the respondent failed to pay the same price when the respondent deposited the entire amount, the allotment was in favor of the respondent. I was reinstated, demanding restoration as a restoration, an order challenging The allotment to the defendant was restored, the applicant was charged, the order of restitution was not a re-allotment in favor of the respondents, and in fact the original allotment order approved by the previous allotment restoration temporary authority. The challenge was failing. In favor of the respondents' request, the original order of the allotment was N without challenge even though the applicant applied for the allotment, no plot for the allotment was available as the respondent's applicant had already been allotted. When the petitioner applied for the allotment, the writ petition filed after nearly six to six years of restoration of the allotment was effected without delay. Under the meaning of section 44 of the Azad Jammu and Kashmir Interim Constitution Act of 1974, the writ petition was, in the circumstances, dismissed by the respondent.
