Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD SHAUKAT DAR versus DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, DISTRICT KAHUTA HAVELI

In Article 44 of the 44 Qunun testimony (10 of 1984), Article 114 writ petitions against civil service appointments made against the advertising posts made by the Selection Committee admit that it had inadvertently tested and interviewed. And was placed in serial number 25. High Court dismisses application on merit list 26

Related judgments — High Court Azad Kashmir, 2012

• MUHAMMAD LATIF KHAN v. MUHAMMAD RASHEED KHAN 2012 MLD 86
• TAHIR MEHMOOD v. AZAD GOVERNMENT OF THE STATE OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR 2012 PLC(CS) 140
• AFTAB GULL v. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, DISTRICT BAGH 2012 PLC(CS) 151
• Ch. MUHAMMAD FAROOQ v. COMMISSIONER REVENUE, AZAD JAMMU AND KASHMIR, MUZAFFARABAD DIVISION 2012 PLC(CS) 157
• SOHAIL BOSTAN CHAUDHARY v. MDA through Chairman MDA Mirpur AK 2012 MLD 422
• KHURSHID HUSSAIN v. AZAD GOVERNMENT through Chief Secretary, Muzaffarabad 2012 PLC(CS) 429
• Professor MUHAMMAD HANIF KHAWAJA v. UNIVERSITY OF AZAD JAMMU AND KASHMIR, MUZAFFARABAD 2012 PLC(CS) 450
• Dr. MUHAMMAD AMIN v. AZAD JAMMU AND KASHMIR GOVERNMENT through Chief Secretary, Muzaffarabad 2012 PLC(CS) 462

All High Court Azad Kashmir judgments of 2012 →

us immigration advocates from Kot Addu lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes