Find a Lawyer

AFTAB GULL versus DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, DISTRICT BAGH

Article Writing Right Petition Civil Service Applicant The applicant had completed the training of the candidate Patwari certificate in connection with the completion of the training under which the writ petition was incorporated. Was not allowed to sit in the test and interview for. Patwari was not included in the list of successful candidates as a successful candidate. The legal process officer was obliged to allow the applicant to compete for a test and interview because a successful candidate did not challenge the applicant's appointment. As Patwari; he claimed to have acted as a successful candidate for himself and was not allowed to compete for the test and interview for the post of applicant version of the applicant and was refused by the authorities. Was denied, the authorities were instructed to treat the applicant as a successful candidate for the test and interview for the post of Patwari and to provide an opportunity to appear in the upcoming test and interview.

Related judgments — High Court Azad Kashmir, 2012

• Mian MUMTAZ AKHTAR v. AZAD JAMMU AND KASHMIR COUNCIL SECRETARIAT through Secretary 2012 PLD 28
• KHALIDA BEGUM v. MUHAMMAD RASHID KHAN 2012 PLD 34
• MUHAMMAD LATIF KHAN v. MUHAMMAD RASHEED KHAN 2012 MLD 86
• TAHIR MEHMOOD v. AZAD GOVERNMENT OF THE STATE OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR 2012 PLC(CS) 140
• Ch. MUHAMMAD FAROOQ v. COMMISSIONER REVENUE, AZAD JAMMU AND KASHMIR, MUZAFFARABAD DIVISION 2012 PLC(CS) 157
• MUHAMMAD SHAUKAT DAR v. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, DISTRICT KAHUTA HAVELI 2012 PLC(CS) 315
• SOHAIL BOSTAN CHAUDHARY v. MDA through Chairman MDA Mirpur AK 2012 MLD 422
• KHURSHID HUSSAIN v. AZAD GOVERNMENT through Chief Secretary, Muzaffarabad 2012 PLC(CS) 429

All High Court Azad Kashmir judgments of 2012 →

inheritance advocates near Sherani lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes