KAMRAN MANZOOR versus SECRETARY CABINET DIVISION/ CHAIRMAN
Article 199 The Constitution responds to an advertisement for the positions of Civil Service Regulation Service Petitioners, Assistant Directors (EG02) and upon completion of the formal procedure, the ad shows that the candidate initially appointed against the posts. Will include investigations and regulate satisfactory performance. Applicants were given the impression that they would be regularized on satisfactory performance. Applicants' cases were submitted to the Cabinet Secretary to regularize their services, but were denied by the competent authority who had been working and performing the applicants for the past five years. Such satisfying applicants of the department rated as satisfactory by the department had achieved through years of hard work, perseverance and previous years, during which time they had crossed the age of 30 and had a new appointment. The opportunity was lost. The department was in need of any government organization petitioners / services, but their services could not be regulated without a prescribed procedure ie conducting the test / interview, the High Court considered the matter sympathetically and instructed the department to Regularize the services of such employees by completing formal services. Without appointments ny the latest application authorities were instructed to consider the applicant's services in accordance with the regular procedures prescribed. \ r \ n
