HAFIZ MUHAMMAD ASLAM versus SECRETARY, MINISTRY OF INTERIOR
Sections 3 and 14 of the Delivery Act (XXI of 1972), Section 7 of the Code of Conduct (XLV of 1860), Article 420/468/471 National Database and Registration Authority Ordinance (VIII of 2000), Section 30 Constitution of Pakistan, Article 199 Constitutional Application During the trial of the deportation of foreign national criminal cases, the State Citizens Determinants (Respondents) approved the deportation orders against the accused (applicant) that the accused confessed that his nationality was in conflict and Unless this is determined, the deportation process should be postponed. At the time of entry into Pakistan, Norway was a passport holder, and for the purpose of proceedings under the Foreigners Act 1946, the accused was considered to be a Norwegian national criminal cases registered and had the responsibility and privileges of the accused until a final decision was reached. The state and it cannot be used as a tool or the state can be changed to an inalienable right The foreign national cannot be claimed to be deported, however, to maintain criminal charges. Cannot be claimed, which the state intended to deport, the criminal prosecution cannot be considered as a privilege assigned to the accused to claim detention. And the detention of a foreign country in which he was charged with a criminal offense was dismissed as a constitutional request and the apex court's earlier order by which the court directed the authorities to Do not deport the accused in accordance with the procedure prescribed by law.
