CH. MUHAMMAD BASHARAT versus CHIEF COMMISSIONER, ISLAMABAD
Article 43, 54, & 64 & A 64 A Constitution of Pakistan, Article 9 Constitution Constitutional Petition Investigating Petitioner Housing Society against the Registrar of Provincial Government Powers and Cooperative Societies for Terminating the Proceedings of Subordinate Officers The Deputy Managing Committee was held and the offices of the Vice-President, Secretary and the Secretary of the Finance were inquired against the applicants on the charge of embezzlement of huge sums respectively and the Inquiry Officer submitted the report to file a false complaint. Legal action against the defendant must begin, the defendant reviewed Before the Chief Commissioner (using the power of Secretary Housing Societies Islamabad), who has ordered a stay order, the registrar for the establishment of the inquiry committee, received the remand of the matter to the cooperative societies, which was held one month. The petitioner had challenged that the Chief had issued the claimant order. The c omissioner used this jurisdiction, which was not included. The justification had to be terminated, as the Chief Commissioner was given broad powers to review the legality or ownership of any decision or order. And the regularity of the action taken by any of the Subordinate Officers, which states that under the provisions of Section 64A of the Co-operative Society Act, 1925, the Chief Commissioner has the validity of the action Have the option to check the status. Conducted by an inquiry officer who submitted the report, the Chief Commissioner, even on his own initiative, found himself looking at the matter and the treatment measures.
