NOOR JAHAN ALIAS AHMED versus JUDGE SPECIAL COURT-2
Section 540 Criminal Procedure (XLV of 1860), Sections 302, 324, 427 and 109 of the Explosive Substances Act (VI of 1908), Sections 3 and 4 of the Anti-Terrorism Act (XXVII of 1997), Section 7 The authority to inspect individuals was recorded during the trial in the absence of a lawyer requesting the deputation of two prosecuting witnesses during their current investigation to examine the prosecution's witnesses. Subsequent submissions had to be investigated for improvement as it could have affected the applicant's defense. The trial court denied the applicant's request that accepting it would delay the trial. The CRPC, following the principles of natural justice, according to the parties' right, did not lose the right to seek witnesses for their investigative purposes, justified by the law of criminal procedure. , Which accuses the prosecutor's witnesses of improving their statements could ultimately affect the defendant's role, The counter could have been configured incorrectly. The prosecution's witnesses have the right to an opportunity to examine the extent to which the defense's request for review was granted, and the trial court asked both prosecution witnesses for the purposes of section investigation for section 161 CCPC. Was directed to seek the extent of their collision of statements.
