AKMAL MUMTAZ versus OIL AND GAS DEVELOPMENT COMPANY LIMITED, ISLAMABAD
Article 199 Constitutional Remarks of the Civil Service Aggressive Remarks Demanding the Applicant's Demand for Removal of Applicant Remarks Demanding Removal of Negative Remarks, He was charged with Quorum Non Jurisdiction The rugged, hard-hearted petitioner alleged that the reporting officer, who had taken a personal turn for some reason, had told negative comments for the relevant period, despite the fact that his previous annual secret Reports were good; either good or bad. Suddenly negative comments against him without any sudden warning advice, Performance Aviation Rules did not support him and he was given a senior position, but all his juniors were promoted due to the obstruction of negative remarks on his way. , But because of the atrocities. Loudly, they were ignored only because of the negative comments the authorities made to the record that counseling was provided to the applicant on various occasions. And from the very beginning he received a negative report, which he preferred to the chairman and the authorities, who had hidden the petitioner himself in his petitions, the available records also stated that not only the reporting officers were against him. The report was given. The applicant disputed this, but other constituents also reported non-cooperation as well as not being interested in the work due to their slow behavior and cheapness, only on non-negative comments within 30 days. There is not much consideration for announcing the only reason for contact. The secret reports will be completely deleted, the applicant records
