Find a Lawyer

SAIF ULLAH versus WAQAR-UL-HAQ

O XLI, R 31 Decision Requirements A judge from O XLI, R 31, CPC is required to present the reasons for the decision, without giving any reason, the decision stated under O XLI, R 31 Will not be eligible, the CPC-infused order was put in the direction that the matter would be decided after giving the two parties the opportunity to hear.

Related judgments — Islamabad, 2012

• LALZADA alias LAL KHAN v. State 2012 YLR 864
• WAQAR SHAH v. State 2012 PCrLJ 866
• Syed UMMAR HUSSAIN v. State 2012 YLR 879
• AKMAL MUMTAZ v. OIL AND GAS DEVELOPMENT COMPANY LIMITED, ISLAMABAD 2012 PLC(CS) 895
• NASEER AHMAD v. NESCOM through Chairman NESCOM, Islamabad 2012 PLC(CS) 924
• Malik SAFDAR ALI KHAN v. State 2012 YLR 930
• Major (Retired) MUHAMMAD FAROOQ v. CHAIRMAN, NATIONAL ACCOUNTABILITY BUREAU (NAB), ISLAMABAD 2012 PLC(CS) 934
• KING CLOTHING v. MUHABAT KHAN 2012 CLC 939

All Islamabad judgments of 2012 →

list of advocates from Karak lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes