Article 497 (2) of the Code of Conduct (XLV of 1860), Article 458/413/401/75/381 and Convention of Conduct (10 of 1984), Articles 38, 39 and 40 of entering into or entering into a house Later in the night, assault or wrongful restraint, dealing in normally stolen property, gangs of thieves, theft of cars or other motor vehicles, confessing to the accused in police custody, charged with vehicle theft and other Similar cases against the accused were registered by both the courts. The petitioner's argument was that there was no direct evidence linking him to the commission of the alleged crime and during his detention nothing was recovered from him, under which the court of law under the provisions of the Articles Was ignored. 38, 39 and 40 of the Conan Evidence Order, and relied on a substance that was not recognized by law and was unacceptable in evidence There was no acceptable evidence for contact t The commission of the crime. The manufacturer was allegedly involved in seven other similar cases but all of them were granted bail by different courts. The court failed to pass the contents of the identification, with no date mentioned. The suspect allegedly identified the location of the incident and the address allegedly reported by the suspect in the memo Unlike the address of the carrier, where the car was allegedly stolen, the registration of other cases when the refusal of bail could not be made. Under Section 497 (2) CRPC, the accused has been granted bail and his case is subject to further investigation.
