DIGITAL MEDIA SOLUTIONS PRIVATE LIMITED versus WARID TELECOM PRIVATE LIMITED
A VII, R 11 & O XXIX, R 1 Copyright Ordinance (XXXIV of 1962), Section 2 (l) and 39 Application of a company for copyright infringement by a company Applicant (Company) sued Applicant (Company) Applicant filed a complaint under Order VII, Rule 11, CPC for infringement of defendant's copyright on certain licensed music content According to the defendants' position, this was not filed with the defendant. By law; respondents only had the right to sell and distribute the licensed content and were not the copyright owners, therefore, there was no cause for litigation and locus standi, And this defendant filed an application before the Copyright Office, but that is still pending and the request has not yet been corrected as it was claimed in favor of the applicant that the claim was made by a legally authorized person Unconfirmed, this was a formal defect that could be fixed later and the claimant could not be dismissed as such. Yes. Did not make the copyright invalid or unlawful for the respondents to register the copyright, nor did they terminate the right to sue for copyright infringement. Important and concrete questions were raised about the facts and law of the applicants who wanted to be decided during the trial. Decision to be made without recording evidence The respondents properly requested the cause of action in the case and at the present stage, the contents were either true or false.
