MIR AHMAD KHAN versus FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN THROUGH SECRETARY, ESTABLISHMENT DIVISION GOVERNMENT OF PAKISTAN, ISLAMABAD
Article 199 Constitution Petition Civil Service Ad hoc Employee, Petitioner's argument was that the defendant was illegally reinstated as Deputy Managing Director of the Department (BPS 20), who acted in the process of the authorities , Adversely affected the right to expect law. The applicant will be considered for promotion to the same post, the post of Deputy Managing Director (BPS 20) was to be filled by the Federal Government through direct appointment, from BPS 20 to BPS 22. Appointments and other positions were, therefore, not made available. The applicant for promotion and appointment to such positions through the initial recruitment could not claim the appointment to the post mentioned by development and the applicant had no jurisdiction, as was the case on the highest scale of his BPS 20. Including the alleged right to be expected. Neither available nor infringed or violated applicant had retired from employment during the approval of the Constitution Petition was not dismissed by any junior officer for his promotion nor was he employed. The dismissed employees were entitled to be considered for the same special committee of the cabinet; ad hoc employees were entitled to reinstatement, neither were disqualified on the basis of the date of appointment in the service nor dismissed from the job. The constitutional application was dismissed based on the date of or because of the fact that the defendant was an ad hoc employee
