Find a Lawyer

THE PROVINCE OF PUNJAB THROUGH COLLECTOR, SIALKOT versus FEROZ DIN

In section 28 [since there is an exception] in the case of illegal occupation, the claimants did not claim the original owners of the land that the (real) landowner died in 1951 and his widow left Pakistan in 1965, Later became the plaintiff. The owners of the land called by the occupier were obliged to enforce the original parents as the defendants in the case when the original owners were not enforced as the defendants in the case. No possible order could be approved for. The plaintiff's actual parties that could object to the plaintiffs' title claim were not biased, therefore, were invalid because only the collector was enforced as a defendant so the appeal of the plaintiff was allowed and claimed. had gone. Excluded \ r \ n \ r \ n

Related judgments — Supreme Court, 2015

• C.M.A. NO. 3854 OF 2014 IN SUO MOTU CASE NO.3 OF 2009 2015 SCMR 882
• Dr. RAJA AAMER ZAMAN v. OMAR AYUB KHAN 2015 SCMR 890
• SEZEI TURKES FAYZI AKKAYA CONSTRUCTION COMPANY (STFA) v. EKON YAPI ONARIM TICARETVE SANAYI LTD. 2015 SCMR 905
• Mst. FATEH BIBI v. KHIZAR HAYAT 2015 SCMR 907
• MUHAMMAD ASHRAF v. UNITED BANK LIMITED 2015 SCMR 911
• GOVERNMENT OF THE PUNJAB through Chief Secretary, Lahore v. Ch. ABDUL SATTAR HANS 2015 SCMR 915
• SHAH NAWAZ KHAN AND SONS v. GOVERNMENT OF N.-W.F.P. 2015 SCMR 945
• GHULAM FAROOQ v. State 2015 SCMR 948

All Supreme Court judgments of 2015 →

criminal advocate from Haripur lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes